Red China’s history is one of unintentional mystery and controversy. She is merely a conduit for excellence, nothing more. But it should be known that our retainers and executors have participated in a series of informational travesties. Censored we are, censored we remain.

That there is not a hierarchical, bureaucratic bushwhack occurring on the Internet is utter nonsense. We, along with other visionaries (such as Arthur T. Murray, Gene Ray, RealDoll.com), have attempted to supplant certain informational agencies to minor success. One must simply search for our name in “quotes” to see our many trials as a fledgling informational agency focusing on visuals and text.

For those interested in our story, we would direct you firstly to two unique biographies posted on Wikipedia, a quasi-international agency etched in relief by their focus on informational reconnaissance (click these links: Alex Smith, Ronald J. Johnson).

Another historian opted to engage in this gathering of intelligence: She posted a brief history of Red China, fetching the newly resurrected magazine an immense amount of popularity, albeit short lived (click here for A History of Red China). Finally, there was a decisive reaction from the Technocratic Right (see Psychonaut), who lost patience with Red China’s large group of campaigners and sloganeers. A two year long debate was about to begin: (click Debate).

The debate ended in tragedy. The string of entries was removed from Wikipedia, and although it lives on in other encyclopedic databases across the web, it shall never be allowed to appear on Wikipedia again. As the previous links displayed the first rise and fall of Red China, the following should show that there are those who would continue to sweep much of the dust under the carpet: (click Mcfly).

Indeed there is, sir. Indeed there is.